Sens. Lisa Murkowski and Thom Tillis are the first GOP members of Congress to call for Noem to step down as secretary of homeland security.
WASHINGTON — Sens. Thom Tillis and Lisa Murkowski called for Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to resign Tuesday, making them the first Republicans in Congress to say she should step down.
Asked whether he had confidence in Noem, Tillis, R-N.C., told reporters on Capitol Hill: “No, not at all. I think she should go.”
Tillis, who is not running seeking another term in Congress, said some of Noem’s actions reflected “amateurish assistant-manager-sort of thought processes,” calling them “unacceptable” for someone in a Cabinet-level position.
“If I were in her position, I can’t think of any point of pride over the last year,” he said.
Murkowski, R-Alaska, whose term runs until January 2029, said Noem should not be running DHS.
“Yes, she should go,” Murkowski told NBC News.
Tillis and Murkowski, who have shown willingness to break with the administration more than other GOP lawmakers, made the comments days after federal officers shot and killed Alex Pretti in Minneapolis, where an immigration officer killed Renee Good this month.
Tillis said Noem or President Donald Trump have to decide whether she should step down.
DHS did not provide a comment on the senators’ remarks, but the White House pointed to Trump’s comments earlier in the day.
In an interview with Fox News, Trump said he still has faith in Noem, calling her work at the border “a tremendous success,” while noting that her accomplishments happened alongside border “czar” Tom Homan “and the whole group.”
Homan on Tuesday took over the reins in Minneapolis, replacing Border Patrol commander Gregory Bovino as the main point of contact for immigration enforcement operations on the ground there.
After Pretti was killed last week, Noem was quick to defend federal officials, claiming Pretti had approached officers with a gun “wishing to inflict harm” on them, and that he “violently resisted” when they “attempted to disarm” him. But eyewitness video contradicted that narrative, showing that Pretti did not have a weapon in hand during the confrontation that led to his death.
The White House on Monday distanced itself from Noem’s remarks, with White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt saying Trump “wants to let the facts and the investigation lead itself.”
Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., sidestepped Tuesday when asked if he has confidence in Noem.
“She serves at the pleasure of the president,” he told reporters. “The important thing is that the president’s got confidence in his team.”
Some Republicans said they have confidence in Noem, including Sen. Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo., while Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla., said she should implement “policy changes” at DHS and review the recent Minnesota shooting.
Centrist Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, who chairs the Appropriations Committee that controls the DHS budget, didn’t go as far as Murkowski or Tillis when asked about Noem.
“I have urged her to have a pause in both Minnesota and Maine on this surge of enforcement,” Collins said Tuesday.
Numerous congressional Democrats have said already said Noem should resign. Still, some warned that ousting Noem won’t change immigration policy, even if they would like to see her replaced.
“She’s unqualified, but so will the next DHS secretary,” said Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn. “The name on the door of DHS doesn’t really matter. This is an operation being run by the president and Stephen Miller.”
Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., said dismissing Noem “would be the smart play for the administration.”
“But I don’t want DHS Secretary Steve Miller,” he said, referring to the White House deputy chief of staff for policy. “I mean, that removal isn’t enough, because then the question is, well, who are you going to put in next?”
The focus on Noem also comes as the Senate faces a crucial deadline of Friday at midnight to pass a massive funding bill or face a partial government shutdown starting Saturday. The bill is expected to come up Thursday. It requires 60 votes to advance, and Democrats have made clear they will block it unless the DHS portion is revised to include guardrails and accountability measures on immigration enforcement operations.
Murphy said no amount of executive actions or promises by Trump can win over Democrats.
“There’s nothing the administration can promise us that will do the job,” he said. “They can’t be trusted to keep to their promises. So we need to change the DHS bill and build reforms into the language of the bill.”
Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii, said that “constructive conversations are happening” about the path forward.
“I think we should be able to land this,” he said, though he wasn’t sure it could be done by the Friday deadline to prevent a shutdown. “I don’t know about timing.”
The FBI is investigating Minnesota Signal chats tracking ICE, Patel says
FBI Director Kash Patel made the statement after right-wing media figures said they joined the chats and claimed participants were obstructing law enforcement.

FBI Director Kash Patel said Monday that he had opened an investigation into the Signal group text chats that Minnesota residents are using to share information about federal immigration agents’ movements, launching a new front in the Trump administration’s conflict there with potential free speech implications.
Patel said in an interview with conservative podcaster Benny Johnson that he wanted to know whether any Minnesota residents had put federal agents “in harm’s way” with activities such as sharing agents’ license plate numbers and locations.
“You cannot create a scenario that illegally entraps and puts law enforcement in harm’s way,” he said in the interview, which was posted to YouTube.
The investigation quickly drew skepticism from free speech advocates who said the First Amendment protects members of the public who share legally obtained information, such as the names of federal agents or where they are conducting enforcement operations.
“There are legitimate reasons to share such information, including enabling members of the public to observe and document law enforcement activity and to hold officials accountable for misconduct,” Aaron Terr, director of public advocacy at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, said in an email.
“Given this administration’s poor track record of distinguishing protected speech from criminal conduct, any investigation like this deserves very close scrutiny,” he said.
For months, digital tools have been at the center of how people have pushed back against immigration enforcement efforts in Minnesota and across the country. The administration’s opponents have used group text chats to track Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations, share photos of suspected ICE vehicles and raise awareness for neighbors. In June, administration officials criticized ICEBlock, an app designed to share information about ICE sightings. Apple removed the app from its app store in October, prompting a lawsuit from the app’s developer alleging the administration unlawfully pressured Apple to remove it.
In the past few days, the group text chats — especially those on the encrypted messaging app Signal — have drawn attention from right-wing media. On Saturday, Cam Higby, a conservative journalist based near Seattle, said in a thread on X that he had “infiltrated” Signal groups from around Minneapolis that he alleged were obstructing law enforcement. His thread, which got 20 million views, focused on how the groups share such information as the license plate numbers of suspected federal vehicles. NBC News has not verified Higby’s claims.
Patel said he got the idea for the investigation from Higby.
“As soon as Higby put that post out, I opened an investigation on it,” he said. “We immediately opened up that investigation, because that sort of Signal chat — being coordinated with individuals not just locally in Minnesota, but maybe even around the country — if that leads to a break in the federal statute or a violation of some law, then we are going to arrest people.”
The Signal Foundation, the nonprofit organization that operates the Signal app, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Signal, which is considered one of the most secure chat apps, is a go-to resource for people concerned about privacy. It is perhaps best known as the app Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth used to share sensitive military information last year in a group chat that accidentally included a journalist.
In the Twin Cities, Signal group chats have been a standard part of toolkits — along with walkie-talkies and whistles — used by activists, parents and neighborhood-watch members who have organized as volunteers to warn families about immigration enforcement activities by relaying real-time information, especially near schools. Patrol volunteers have said that, with more than 3,000 federal immigration agents in Minnesota, they are motivated by a desire to protect parents, children and school staff members who are not U.S. citizens.
Patel did not say which laws he thought Minnesota residents may have violated. An FBI spokesperson said the bureau had no further information to provide.
The announcement seemed likely to have implications for the First Amendment’s guarantee of free speech. Alex Abdo, litigation director at the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, said the First Amendment protects the right to record law enforcement officers as they carry out their official responsibilities.
“The ability of everyday citizens to hold government agents to account, by observing them and advocating for change, is what has distinguished the American experiment with democracy from authoritarian regimes around the world,” Abdo said in an email.
“Unless the FBI has evidence of a crime, and not just evidence of activity the Constitution protects, it should stand down,” he said.
Patel acknowledged in the interview with Johnson that an investigation into group text chats would raise free speech concerns and said the FBI would “balance” the rights guaranteed by the First and Second amendments with what he said were potential violations of federal law.
“Now, we will balance the First and Second amendment constantly, but we have to let the community know that we will not tolerate acts of violence and an escalation and a violation of the federal code,” he said. The Second Amendment could be at issue because Alex Pretti, the nurse shot and killed by a federal agent Saturday in Minneapolis, was permitted to carry a gun in public and had one with him.
Terr, of the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, said the government does not get to “balance” the First Amendment against its other interests.
“The Constitution takes precedence over any conflicting state or federal law, and over any official’s desire to suppress speech they dislike,” he said in his email.
He added: “There is a First Amendment exception for speech intended and likely to provoke imminent unlawful action, but that doesn’t apply to just any speech the government claims puts officials in harm’s way. By contrast, if individuals are threatening federal agents or conspiring to physically harm them, that is illegal. But conspiracy requires an agreement to commit a specific crime and a substantial step toward carrying it out.”
Patel also said the FBI had made “substantial progress” in an investigation into groups and people responsible for funding resistance to immigration enforcement. He alleged that the protests and neighborhood monitoring are “not happening organically” but did not immediately provide evidence.






:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():focal(749x226:751x228):format(webp)/Mom-Notices-Period-Stain-on-Laundry-122325-1-cb148a098faf4c21a74ed89dcfa0c6ab.jpg?w=1200&resize=1200,0&ssl=1)


























:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():focal(1135x842:1137x844)/Minnesota-Shooting-012426-05-ec3dbff32cae4e7f89a85f645abb6249.jpg?w=1200&resize=1200,0&ssl=1)

