EXCLUSIVE: ‘Cluck Off Meghan!’ Why ‘Desperate Duchess’ Markle is Now Being Savaged Over Her Chicken Coop

EXCLUSIVE: ‘Cluck Off Meghan!’ Why ‘Desperate Duchess’ Markle is Now Being Savaged Over Her Chicken Coop

RadarOnline.com can reveal Meghan Markle‘s domestic life is being pecked over by trolls after she shared a video of her daughter Princess Lilibet visiting the family’s chicken coop – with critics mocking the Duchess and insisting she does not tend to the animals herself.

The Duchess of Sussex, 44, posted the clip to her Instagram Stories on March 16, showing Lilibet, 4, petting chickens at the family’s Montecito, California home, where Meghan lives with Prince Harry, 41, and their son Archie.

The Duchess’ Quiet Life With Rescue Chickens

Screenshot of Princess Lilibeth trying to pet a chicken
Source: @meghan/InstagramMarkle shared a video of her daughter, Princess Lilibet, in the family chicken coop.

The couple, who infamously stepped back from royal duties in 2020, have long highlighted their quieter lifestyle in the U.S., including their rescue hens housed in a coop dubbed Archie’s Chick Inn, a nod to their son Prince Archie, 6. The setup was first seen publicly during Markle and Harry’s 2021 interview with Oprah Winfrey, where the duchess said, “I just love rescuing,” in reference to the hens saved from a factory farm.

An insider told us: “Meghan intended her video of Lilibet with their chickens as a warm, personal glimpse into her home life, but the reaction online quickly took on a very different tone. What might have been seen as wholesome instead became a lightning rod for criticism.”

“Trolls began questioning the authenticity of what they were seeing, rather than simply engaging with the moment itself,” the source added.

Critics Question Authenticity Of Lifestyle

Photo of Meghan Markle
Source: @meghan/InstagramThe Duchess arranged flowers in the garden during the video series.

 

Another source said the backlash has centered on scepticism about Meghan’s involvement in caring for the animals.

They added: “There is a growing chorus of voices online effectively telling her to ‘Cluck off Meghan!’, with critics claiming the image being presented doesn’t match reality.

“Some are openly suggesting that she isn’t the one tending to the chickens day-to-day and that staff are likely responsible, which has fueled a wave of trolling.”

The video at the center of the fresh attacks on Markle shows her laughing as Lilibet, dressed in rain boots and a purple coat, reaches down to pet one of the birds, her red hair visible as she leans forward.

It formed part of a series of posts that also included clips of Markle arranging flowers in the garden, with Harry heard off-camera saying: “It’s beautiful,” before adding: “So pretty in pink.”

Ongoing Scrutiny Around Public Image

Photo of Meghan Markle
Source: NETFLIXCritics have questioned the authenticity of the domestic scene. 

A third insider said the reaction reflects a broader pattern in how Markle’s public image is received.

The source added: “There is a persistent skepticism around anything she shares that is intended to appear relatable or domestic, with floods of trolls saying she just often comes across as desperate to be liked, but ends up coming across as fake instead.

“As a result, even something as simple as a moment with her daughter and a few chickens is being picked apart and questioned.”

They continued: “For some observers, there is an assumption that there must be a team behind the scenes managing these aspects of her life, which undermines the authenticity she is trying to convey.”

Markle has previously spoken about her enjoyment of quieter, creative pursuits, including flower arranging, which she discussed in her Netflix series With Love, Meghan.

 

 

Photo of Meghan Markle
Source: NETFLIXA source described the online backlash as a lightning rod for criticism.

She said: “I learned a lot of this when I was pregnant with my son, Archie. My girlfriends threw a baby shower for me, and one of the things we did was learn flower arranging. I started to find this really calming and meditative, so when I have a little bit of time at the end of the day, I do this. I have a glass of wine and just enjoy it.”

Another source said the intensity of the reaction to her chicken video highlights the ongoing scrutiny surrounding the Duchess.

The insider added: “There is a sense that anything Meghan puts out is immediately subjected to a level of analysis that goes beyond what most public figures experience.

“Even something as ordinary as keeping chickens becomes a talking point, and that level of attention often quickly turns critical.”

The British Royal Family Once “Blushed” Over Meghan Markle’s Steamy Scenes: Should Modern Women Sacrifice Their Careers for a Husband?

Meghan Markle gave up her career for love. Should you too?

Before becoming the Duchess of Sussex, Meghan Markle was a glamorous actress on the Hollywood screen. However, few know that those very fiery roles were once a thorn in the side of her in-laws, forcing her to make a harsh choice: a brilliant career or a step into the Royal Family?

Marrying into a wealthy, powerful family has never been an easy equation, and marrying into the British Royal Family is a challenge of historic proportions. As the latest information is revealed regarding the Royal Family’s apprehension over Meghan Markle’s “overly sexy” acting past, many women can only sigh. We women, regardless of our status, always seem to be placed on a scale between work and family. Her story is not just a matter of palace secrets, but also the common sentiment of countless modern women: Is it worth trading one’s youth and career just for a marriage?

Culture Shock from “Hot” Footage

The day Meghan Markle and Prince Harry began dating, global public attention shifted toward the beautiful American girl. But inside the stone walls of Buckingham Palace, a wave of concern silently rose. The issue did not lie in her background, but in the very achievements she had labored to build on screen.

Meghan Markle From The Red Carpet To TV To Films: Her Career In Photos

According to Ms. Eliza Roberts—the wife of veteran actor Eric Roberts and a sophisticated talent management expert—the British Royal Family was truly embarrassed by Meghan’s role as Rachel Zane in the hit TV series Suits. The trouble stemmed from the strict protocols of the monarchy, where every image must be standard and decorous.

Meghan’s role at the time was exceedingly sexy, particularly the passionate love scenes on screen with co-star Patrick J. Adams. For a clan deeply rooted in tradition and conservatism, witnessing their future daughter-in-law perform intimate scenes with another man was a true culture shock—something that, as Ms. Eliza described, “they had never seen anything like before.”

That very invisible barrier created immense pressure, forcing Meghan to make the decision to retire from the stage in late 2017, closing out seven brilliant seasons of the show to prepare for the fairytale wedding in May 2018.

Meghan Markle's 'very sexy' TV role 'raised concerns with Royal Family'

Trading Youth and the Question: “Should Women Quit Their Jobs for Marriage?”

The decision to set aside scripts and turn her back on the camera lens to don the high-collared attire of a full-time working Royal was once praised by the public as a noble sacrifice for love. However, in the eyes of industry professionals and modern women, it was a trade-off that was far too great.

Eliza Roberts bluntly expressed regret upon witnessing Meghan give up her job: “She worked incredibly hard, pouring so much sweat and effort in to be able to reach that position. Forcing her to give it up was truly outrageous. Women today should not, and never have to, throw away their work and passion just for a marriage anymore.”

Although she understood Meghan’s intentions and efforts to integrate at that time, those who had contact with her affirmed she was born for the arts. From the moment she stepped into the frame, Meghan radiated the qualities of a true star. Suppressing a person born to shine within rigid rules is, ultimately, a suffocation of the individual self. And reality proved that such coercion could not last forever.

Human endurance always has limits, especially for a woman of mettle and independence. The 2020 decision of Harry and Meghan to withdraw from the Royal Family was not just a media earthquake, but also a powerful declaration of the right to live one’s own life. They moved to the U.S., building a peaceful home beside their two little angels, Prince Archie (6 years old) and Princess Lilibet (4 years old). And then, like a bird released from its cage, Meghan has begun making moves to return to her passion.

From an objective perspective, East Asian culture has the saying “When in Rome, do as the Romans do.” Meghan may have once shone under the stage lights, but the Royal Family is an institution that operates according to traditions rooted for centuries. Those strict regulations were not born to specifically disadvantage her, but are the collective heritage of an entire dynasty. Nodding to enter such a symbolic family requires careful consideration of what must be given up. In reality, many members of the Royal Family have had to step back, restrain their egos, and change their personal lifestyles to preserve the dignity of the regime. Ultimately, every choice comes with a trade-off. It is difficult to blame the Royal Family for being too conservative or to complain about “losing one’s identity” when that was the path she chose for herself.


Harry and Meghan Must Self-Fund Australia Trip Amid Wave of Backlash

Meghan Markle & Prince Harry's Australia Trip Faces Backlash from Locals -  AOL

More than 32,000 people in Australia have signed a petition demanding that Harry and Meghan personally cover all costs for their upcoming visit, amid concerns that public funds could be used for what is characterized as a personal endeavor.

A wave of opposition erupted as a petition on the Change.org platform rapidly garnered more than 32,700 signatures in a short period. The campaign, launched by the organization Beyond Australia, calls on the government not to use taxpayer money for security, logistics, or any perks for the couple.

“This is a personal and commercial trip and should be treated exactly for what it is,” a group representative emphasized. They argued that in the context of citizens facing escalating cost-of-living pressures, the use of public resources for celebrities is unreasonable.

Meghan Markle & Prince Harry's Australia Trip May Be Misleading — Expert


Previously, the Australian public raised questions regarding who would pay for Harry and Meghan’s security operations, as neither the federal nor state governments had provided a clear answer. However, sources later stated that the trip would be entirely funded by private money.

Despite this, the controversy has not cooled down, particularly as Meghan is expected to participate in a women’s-only event titled “Her Best Life Retreat” in Sydney. The three-day event, running from April 17 to 19, brings together approximately 300 guests and has sold out, with VIP packages including front-row seating and a photo opportunity with the Duchess.

This event has also faced several scandals ahead of its opening. The host hotel is rushing to complete facilities such as the infinity pool, spa, and relaxation area. Some guests who stayed there recently reported that the area remains under construction, affecting the experience.

Furthermore, the beach area near the hotel was reportedly subject to foul-smelling waste over a long period, raising environmental concerns about the surrounding venue.

Responding to the wave of criticism, a representative for Harry and Meghan dismissed the petition as “pointless” since the trip is privately funded. The spokesperson also sarcastically remarked that the vast majority of Australians did not sign the petition, so it cannot be inferred that they support the opposing viewpoint.

Nevertheless, the incident continues to show that the image of the Sussexes remains controversial, especially whenever they appear in activities with commercial elements after leaving the British royal family.

——————————————-

Meghan Allegedly Causes Millions in Losses for Netflix

Amid a series of rumors regarding a rift with Netflix, Meghan is further alleged to have caused the partner millions of dollars in losses following the termination of the collaboration with As Ever.

According to sources from behind the scenes of the entertainment industry, the Netflix platform invested a large sum of money into Meghan’s business project but did not achieve the expected profits. Some insiders believe the company “accepted cutting its losses” when deciding to halt the partnership after less than a year.

Meghan Markle's As Ever Netflix Exit Deal Lost Streamer 'Millions': 'They  Just Cut a Loss' - AOL

As Ever—the lifestyle brand launched by Meghan in 2025—was initially developed in tandem with the television program With Love, Meghan. However, when the show did not continue to expand, maintaining the investment in this brand was reportedly no longer justifiable for Netflix.

Some sources further revealed that As Ever’s inventory once reached over $10 million, including tea, bakery items, and other consumer products. Nevertheless, representatives for Meghan and her husband assert that the original plan was for the brand to operate independently, without long-term reliance on Netflix.

Conversely, many industry perspectives suggest that building a consumer brand requires a long time to become profitable. Examples such as Amazon or many famous beauty brands all took several years to reach the break-even point, so evaluating effectiveness in the short term may be premature.

Meghan Markle wasn't 'going to get her hands dirty' as Netflix series  'axed' - The Mirror

Despite the controversy, Meghan continues to promote new products. Recently, she collaborated with High Camp Supply to launch a high-end floral gift box valued at $255, while also mobilizing her two children, Archie and Lilibet, to participate in promotional videos on social media.

Meanwhile, the relationship between Meghan, Prince Harry, and Netflix is reportedly maintained at the level of content development collaboration. The platform’s Chief Content Officer, Bela Bajaria, spoke out to deny negative rumors, asserting that the two sides still have many projects currently in development.

Nonetheless, observers believe the future of As Ever remains a major question mark in the fiercely competitive lifestyle market, where Meghan was once expected to become a rival to names like Gwyneth Paltrow or Martha Stewart. In the meantime, Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos has also quietly unfollowed Meghan and As Ever on Instagram.

Currently, Meghan is reportedly pushing for the international expansion of the brand, with numerous trademark applications for products in Australia—a move that demonstrates long-term development ambitions despite the skepticism surrounding the relationship with Netflix.

Step into a world dedicated entirely to man's best friend - dogs. Our website is a treasure trove of heartwarming news, touching stories, and inspiring narratives centered around these incredible creatures. We invite you to join us in spreading the joy. Share our posts, stories, and articles with your friends, extending the warmth and inspiration to every corner.With a simple click, you can be part of this movement.
Share:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *