Democrats Have a Pod Save America Problem

Democrats Have a Pod Save America Problem

The biggest shadow hanging over the party after the election boils down to one man’s singular legacy.

 

Democrats to e-vote to confirm Kamala Harris as nominee | The Australian

 

With the dust now settled on the presidential election, dismayed Democrats have begun taking stock, which is not to be confused with taking accountability. How should the party respond to its decisive second loss to Donald Trump, who left office in 2021 with the lowest approval rating of all time?

One answer that seems to be coming resoundingly from Barack Obama-era veterans is a return to Obama-style politics. That was made clearest in an uproar-raising episode of Pod Save America, which featured 90 minutes of Kamala Harris’ four most senior campaign directors talking about what went wrong to contribute to Harris’ defeat.

Pod Save America' Staff Is Disillusioned by the Politics at Media Powerhouse - Bloomberg

 

The very long conversation was dominated by former Obama 2008 campaign manager David Plouffe and Obama 2012 deputy campaign manager Stephanie Cutter—both of whom came off the bench to helm Harris’ campaign after Biden dropped out—talking with Dan Pfeiffer, who took over Plouffe’s old job as a senior adviser to Obama. Jen O’Malley Dillon and Quentin Fulks, both of whom were on the Biden and Harris campaigns, were present, too. To round things out, Jon Lovett, Jon Favreau, and Tommy Vietor, the hosts of Pod Save America, also all worked in the Obama White House.

In short, this was the Obama wing of the Democratic Party talking to itself, and what did it find? Herein lies the controversy: Those campaign stalwarts found that, by and large, they did a great job on Harris’ campaign, that the race was basically unwinnable, that frustrated Democratic voters—who can’t believe that they got swept by the least popular president in American history—are being unfair and uncharitable to the strategists’ efforts in what was a very compressed campaign season.

Exclusive: The Harris Campaign On What Went Wrong | Crooked Media

 

This, despite the fact that the Harris campaign parlayed a truly unbelievable $1.5 billion, a massive cash advantage, into the first Democratic popular vote loss in 20 years. Harris was unable to move one single state in her direction (all 50 went more toward Trump than in 2020), and, according to pollster Patrick Ruffini, the first since 1932 to not flip a single county.

Meanwhile, Democratic vote share collapsed in blue strongholds, as base Democratic turnout dipped substantially. That comes as no surprise, as seemingly the entire campaign was pitched toward courting mythical right-leaning moderate voters, a very Obama-style political maneuver. This was the justification for Harris spending so many days on the campaign trail with Republican Liz Cheney. Harris did perform better in those swing states where she campaigned and spent lavishly than in those places where she did not, but those Nikki Haley–voting Republicans simply did not materialize in winning numbers.

 

Democratic officials blame Harris election loss on outside factors | Reuters

 

Yes, there were tough headwinds; incumbent political leaders all over the globe lost in record numbers this year. But as the New York Times reported in the days before the election, the Harris campaign’s affiliated super PAC was alarmed by senior Harris campaign staff’s insistence on focusing so intensely on Trump’s character and warning of his fascist tendencies in the final stretch. That decency message—a very Obama-style flourish—was being favored over a more pugilistic, economic-policy-forward message. “Purely negative attacks on Trump’s character are less effective than contrast messages that include positive details about Kamala Harris’s plans to address the needs of everyday Americans,” an email from the super PAC read.

When the campaign tapped Obama himself to hit the trail, he leaned so far into the decency messaging that he set about scolding Black male voters who dared not vote for Harris. As a demographic group, Black men went on to nearly double their support for Trump over 2020.

 

Karl Rove: If You're a Democrat Today, You Have to Bet Against Joe Biden Winning - nelsoschneider.com.br

 

The failure of the “Trump Is Bad” approach implicates Pod Save America, too. According to nearly every campaign postmortem, the ecosystem of sort of sloppy right-wing podcasts played a critical role in elevating Trump, swamping the influence of the podcast which is the brightest beacon of Obama-style politics, and—in an ideal world—would have figured as the Democratic answer in this media environment. The Pod Save America episode with the Harris staffers was met with a firestorm of criticism online from commenters and journalists who bristled at the self-satisfied tone and lack of soul-searching. Needless to say, the pod did not save America.

The results are clear: The Democrats need to do something really different. And yet the Obama wing of the party, which basically took over Harris’ campaign, now insists that the only solution is a return to even more Obama-style politics: more moderation, an embrace of big money and friendlier dealings with Wall Street and Silicon Valley, and a less combative stance toward Republicans. It’s the line of thinking that led Harris to refuse to commit to keeping President Joe Biden’s Federal Trade Commission chair Lina Khan, who has gone after Big Tech and Big Pharma—or just hammer corporate greed in any way, at all. This was a clear break from the Biden presidency.

Tổng thống Mỹ Biden sẽ tăng viện cho Ukraine ngay sau Giáng Sinh

 

“We have to dominate the moderate vote,” said Plouffe on the podcast, of his prescription for the future. “And I think as we look ahead towards ’26 and ’28 … we obviously have to get some of that back, we can’t afford any more erosion there.” Maybe I’m missing something, but the post-loss diagnosis sure seems like “We did everything right” and the post-loss prescription seems to be “More of what we just did.”

David Axelrod, the former chief strategist on both the Obama 2008 and Obama 2012 campaigns, is pushing for the same thing. He recently began advocating for former Obama chief of staff Rahm Emanuel to be reinstated as the Democratic National Committee chair. Emanuel is perhaps best known for his willingness to go to war with the party’s left flank, rather than Republicans, and his colorful contempt for unions.

 

Ông Biden gây tranh cãi khi "đại xá" kỷ lục cho 1.500 người | Báo Dân trí

 

 

And yet, not even Emanuel himself seems to believe in the efficacy of Obama-era policy and politics. In a pretty stunning CNN interview this week, Emanuel went off on the legacy of policy decisions he and his former boss had a direct role in implementing.

“The Iraq War, in which the American people were deceived, spent trillions of dollars, thousands of soldiers lost their lives … people were deceived and lied into a war and not one person responsible for that deception ever was held accountable,” he said. “Six years later, the financial industry lies to the American people, people lose their homes, their livelihoods, and the bankers are screaming for their bonuses. Nobody held accountable.”

 

Tầm ảnh hưởng lâu dài của ông Obama với đảng Dân chủ - Báo VnExpress

 

Of course, it was the Obama administration, and Emanuel himself, that proudly chose the route of no accountability for these actors, for both the Iraq War and the financial crisis, stressing a need for comity with Republicans and Wall Street and a desire to turn the page.

Interestingly, Harris campaign adviser Cutter built her national reputation as an adviser to Obama Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, where, according to the New York Times, “she protected Geithner’s fragile reputation and tried to spin unpopular policies like the Troubled Asset Relief Program and the A.I.G. bailout.” The TARP program was perhaps the most scandalous bank bailout program of all, one that was meant to prevent the foreclosure crisis but ended up as a Wall Street bonanza rife with fraud, and did substantial damage to Americans’ view of their own government.

 

Notable & Quotable: The White House on Joe Biden - WSJ

 

For good reason, Democrats pine for the days of Obama where the top of the ticket was beloved by Americans. But Obama was a singular political talent, and going back to Obama-era political strategies won’t solve the problems facing Obama-less Dems. While Obama himself cruised through two presidential elections, Democrats not named Obama got obliterated in that period: In the eight years he was president, the party lost a total of 15 state House chambers, 14 state Senate chambers, 960 state legislative seats, 10 governorships, 62 seats in Congress, and 11 seats in the Senate.

 

Joe Biden | Biography, Family, Policies, & Facts | Britannica

 

President Biden, despite his profound personal unpopularity, almost certainly had the party closer to a winning program: his economic populist approach, his antitrust agenda, his embrace of unions, and his broader social spending were all taken up by the Trump campaign at some level, bespeaking an obvious popularity that was backed up by polling. This has not gone unnoticed by some of the biggest boosters of centrism. New York Times opinion columnist David Brooks recently posited that maybe “in order to win working class votes in an era of high distrust, the Democrats have to do a lot of things that Bernie Sanders said they should do.”

That tension over the future of the Democratic Party hasn’t broken out into civil war yet. But it remains an unresolved issue, and those factions will begin battling it out more openly come January, when the next DNC chair is chosen.

 

Democratic officials blame Harris election loss on outside factors

WASHINGTON, Dec 3 (Reuters) – While many Democrats are calling for a party overhaul after Kamala Harris lost every battleground state to Republican Donald Trump in the presidential election, some party officials insist it could have been worse and are asking for fresh donations.
The party lost ground in the Nov. 5 election among once-core working class, Latino and women voters. Republicans emerged in charge of the White House and both houses of Congress.
Democrats blame Harris election loss on outside factors - anews
Democratic National Committee chair Jaime Harrison sought to play down the extent of the defeat in a memo on Tuesday.
“Although Democrats did not achieve what we set out to do, Trump wasn’t able to capture the support of more than 50% of the electorate and Democrats beat back global headwinds that could’ve turned this squeaker into a landslide,” Harrison wrote. “Trump’s election is far from a mandate.”
2024 election: Follow live updates as Trump, Harris campaign
Harrison, who has said he plans to leave his post next year, said the result fit a global pattern in which 80% of incumbent parties lost seats or vote share in 2024. The party’s heavy campaign spending across the country helped prevent “what could have been a larger red wave” of Republican victories, he said.
Far-right parties have gained ground in Europe, especially with younger voters, and are questioning climate change and pro-immigration policies.
Democrats raised about $1.5 billion in the 2024 campaign, much of it after Harris took over from President Joe Biden as the candidate in late July. Nonetheless, the campaign finished the election in the red, financially and politically.
38 Republicans join Democrats to reject Trump-approved funding package
“Continued investment in the central party apparatus is crucial,” Harrison said.
Harris’ loss shocked many Democratic voters and activists who thought a flood of volunteers, fundraising and fresh momentum would help her win. Some Democrats blamed Biden for not stepping aside earlier.

 

U.S. voters identified jobs and the economy as the country’s most pressing problem, Reuters/Ipsos opinion polls found, and were concerned about high prices. Trump also claimed, without evidence, a rise in crime due to illegal immigration and blamed immigrants for high prices.
Top Harris advisers, including her campaign chair Jen O’Malley Dillon, deputy campaign manager Quentin Fulks, and advisers Stephanie Cutter and David Plouffe cited other outside factors in a recent interview.
Bà Harris nhận 81 triệu USD đóng góp trong 24 giờ sau khi ông Biden dừng tranh cử
They said Americans’ post-COVID economic woes and the short 107-day span of the Harris campaign worked against Democrats and the damage caused by two hurricanes in the final weeks before Election Day diverted attention from Harris’ whirlwind campaign.
“This political environment sucked, okay? We were dealing with ferocious headwinds, and I think people’s instinct was to give the Republicans, and even Donald Trump, another chance. So we had a complicated puzzle to put together here in terms of the voters,” Plouffe told podcast Pod Save America last week.
Why Democrats' favorite podcast turned on Joe Biden | Semafor
James Carville, a party strategist who was the top political aide to former President Bill Clinton, has called for an audit of the campaign and the Democratic Super Political Action Committee known as Future Forward.
He said fundraisers are exhausted.
“They’re really pissed now, and the damage that the 2024 campaign has done, that the damage that this decade has done to the Democratic brand is almost unfathomable,” Carville said on a recent podcast.
Senator Bernie Sanders, a former presidential candidate, is among lawmakers blaming the loss on Democrats’ failure to focus on working class issues.
Others have clamored for new leadership, especially after hearing the Harris campaign managers’ explanations.
Harris campaign embraces TikTok as efforts to restrict app sputter along
“If I see a dumpster fire and we’ve put it out and I want to work on how to prevent future dumpster fires, I’m not going to go talk to the arsonists,” Aidan Kohn-Murphy, the founder of Gen Z for Change, a political activism group, said on TikTok.
The DNC invested $264 million in U.S. states, Harrison wrote in Tuesday’s memo, helping to pass state abortion rights measures, win legislative seats in others and make it easier for workers to unionize.
Trump defeated Harris in the Electoral College 312-226 but received slightly less than 50% of the popular vote because of third-party candidates. His margin of victory over Harris by total votes — around 1.5% — ranks 44th out of 51 elections since 1824, Harrison said.
Democrats won Senate seats in four states that Trump won, and Democratic Senate candidates in battleground states overperformed Harris by an average of 5 percentage points, Harrison wrote.

Step into a world dedicated entirely to man's best friend - dogs. Our website is a treasure trove of heartwarming news, touching stories, and inspiring narratives centered around these incredible creatures. We invite you to join us in spreading the joy. Share our posts, stories, and articles with your friends, extending the warmth and inspiration to every corner.With a simple click, you can be part of this movement.
Share:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *