The Russian leader agreed to a 30-day halt to attacks on energy infrastructure but laid down his own demands for an eventual peace.

ne hour into Donald Trump’s phone call with Vladimir Putin on 18 March, a White House aide reported that the conversation was “going well”. The following hour, with the two leaders still talking, the head of Russia’s sovereign wealth fund, Kirill Dmitriev, announced that, as a result of the dialogue, the world had “become a much safer place today!”. Channelling the Trumpian vernacular, he pronounced the results: “Historic! Epic!” But when the call ended and the two sides released the details, it became clear that they had agreed to little of substance at all.

First, the good news. According to the Kremlin’s summary, Russia and Ukraine have agreed to exchange 175 prisoners of war on 19 March. Putin also “responded positively” to Trump’s suggestion of a 30-day halt to attacks on energy infrastructure and “immediately” ordered his military to comply. This is not an act of charity on the Russian leader’s behalf. While Ukraine will undoubtedly welcome the pause in Russian air strikes against its power grid, its own forces have targeted Russian oil refineries and energy storage facilities using long-range drones in recent months, including an attack on a major refinery outside Moscow on 11 March.

The White House said that “technical negotiations” would now begin immediately in the Middle East on the “implementation of a maritime ceasefire in the Black Sea, full ceasefire and permanent peace.” But it was not clear what that meant or who would be negotiating. The Kremlin said that the US and Russia would set up expert groups to discuss a settlement but there was no mention of an equivalent group from Ukraine.

Predictably, Trump lauded his “very good and productive” conversation with Putin in a self-congratulatory post on Truth Social. As he framed it, the temporary energy and infrastructure ceasefire was agreed on the understanding that “we will be working quickly to have a Complete Ceasefire and, ultimately, an END to this very horrible War”, which he insisted, as he always does, “would have never started if I were President!”. Trump claimed that many elements of a “Contract for Peace were discussed”, but he declined to say what this might involve, merely lamenting the number of soldiers who were being killed on both sides and insisting that both Putin and Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, were keen to bring the war to an end.

Yet Putin has given no such indication. Unsaid, but apparent from its glaring absence in the official readouts, was the fact that the Russian president is clearly uninterested in Trump’s proposal for an immediate, unconditional 30-day ceasefire, which Ukraine had agreed in principle on 11 March after the US suspended intelligence sharing and military aid. Then, the US secretary of state Marco Rubio had announced that the ball was now in Russia’s court. “If they say no then we’ll unfortunately know what the impediment is to peace here.” Of course, Putin is savvy enough to avoid angering Trump by rejecting his ceasefire proposal outright, but the effect of his remarks, in which he outlined a “series of significant issues” and “serious risks” regarding the enforcement of any deal, amounted to the same outcome: Russia intends to continue the war.

In fact, Putin laid down his own demands “to stop the conflict from escalating” – which might reasonably be interpreted as a threat – and as a condition for any eventual settlement. He told Trump there must be an end to foreign military aid and intelligence sharing with Ukraine, and the “unconditional necessity to remove the initial causes for the crisis and Russia’s legal security interests.” In other words, Putin is not backing down from his original objectives that Ukraine must be forced to significantly disarm and Europe’s post-Cold War security architecture revised.

When Zelensky attempted to reason with Trump during their ill-fated encounter in the Oval Office month, he was publicly scolded, ejected from the White House, and told to come back when he was “ready for peace,” but the US president seems determined to see the best in his Russian counterpart. While apparently making minimal progress towards peace in Ukraine on Tuesday, the two leaders discussed the “huge upside” of normalising US-Russia relations, according to the White House statement, and the “enormous economic deals” that lie ahead. Trump also seems to have agreed to Putin’s suggestion that they organise ice hockey matches between their respective professional teams in the US and Russia, even as the latter continues its assault on Ukraine and the Russian leader is still wanted by the International Criminal Court on charges of committing war crimes.

The only upside for Zelensky, who at the time of writing was still waiting to be told the details of “what the Russians offered the Americans or what the Americans offered the Russians,” is that Trump does not yet seem to have agreed a grand bargain with Putin to carve up Ukraine above the heads of its citizens. Trump’s remarks in recent days that he intended to discuss “land” and “power plants” and “dividing up certain assets” with Putin had triggered alarm in Kyiv, and many European capitals, that the US intended to force Ukraine into a deal to end the war on Putin’s terms.

While the Ukrainian leader nominally welcomed the talks and indicated that his forces would abide by the energy infrastructure ceasefire, he held his own calls with the French president Emmanuel Macron and the outgoing German chancellor Olaf Scholz. The Ukrainian military, meanwhile, which has been forced to retreat recently from most of the land it has held in the Russian region of Kursk since last summer, attempted a new offensive in the neighbouring region of Belgorod. Despite all the hype now emanating from the White House, it is clear to Ukraine and its European allies that Putin has no serious interest in peace and that they must prepare to fight on.

Thousands of pages of new JFK assassination files released, fulfilling Trump promise: ‘New era’

80,000 pages of previously-unseen files related to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy were released Tuesday after President Donald Trump made the long-awaited announcement just one day earlier.

“So, people have been waiting for decades for this, and I’ve instructed my people… lots of different people, [director of national intelligence] Tulsi Gabbard, that they must be released tomorrow,” Trump said during a visit to the Kennedy Center in Washington.

 

 

 

“You got a lot of reading. I don’t believe we’re going to redact anything. I said, ‘just don’t redact, you can’t redact.'”

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard commended Trump’s move in an X post on Tuesday, writing that the president “is ushering in a new era of maximum transparency.”

“Today, per his direction, previously redacted JFK Assassination Files are being released to the public with no redactions,” Gabbard wrote. “Promises made, promises kept.”

Gabbard also said that the previously-classified records were published “with no redactions.”

“Additional documents withheld under court seal or for grand jury secrecy, and records subject to section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code, must be unsealed before release. NARA is working with the Department of Justice to expedite the unsealing of these records,” Gabbard said in a separate statement. “Grand juries from many years ago have already seen them, so most of this information is already out, but regardless of this, this information will be immediately released upon the direction of the Court.”

Some redactions will be made to documents released in the future, despite the President’s earlier statements, a source familiar with the matter told Fox News. Redactions will include personal information such as Social Security numbers of those cited in the documents and “live assets in Cuba,” the source said.

Fox News also was told that due to the large volume of documents it will take several days to release them all, with Tuesday being the first day.

 

 

President John F. Kennedy was assassinated by Lee Harvey Oswald in 1963 while visiting Dallas. (Associated Press)

Back in January, Trump signed an executive order to declassify files on the assassinations of JFK, his brother Robert F. Kennedy (RFK) and civil rights icon Martin Luther King, Jr. (MLK). The order requested that the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) and the attorney general submit a proposed plan for the JFK files release by February 7.

Both offices, in coordination with the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs and the Counsel to the President, had until the end of the day to submit their proposed plan.

DNI and other officials were expected to submit their proposed release plans for the RFK and MLK files on March 9.

The JFK files release comes just a few weeks after the Justice Department revealed a batch of Jeffrey Epstein files in late February. Many of the documents publicized then had already been released during the federal criminal trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s former lover and convicted accomplice.

The lack of new material prompted an outcry and criticism of the Trump administration’s handling of the Epstein files – and questions about what the RFK and MLK documents could hold upon their release.

A new batch of approximately 80,000 unredacted files on the assassination of President John F. Kennedy is set to be released Tuesday after President Donald Trump made the long-awaited announcement just one day earlier. (Associated Press)

The FBI previously said in a February statement that it had conducted a new records search in light of Trump’s executive order, saying at the time, “The search resulted in approximately 2400 newly inventoried and digitized records that were previously unrecognized as related to the JFK assassination case file.”

 

The promise of a JFK files release has been reiterated over the last several administrations, with Trump promising on the campaign trail to declassify the documents upon entering his second term.

“When I return to the White House, I will declassify and unseal all JFK assassination-related documents. It’s been 60 years, time for the American people to know the truth,” he said at the time.

Former President Joe Biden also released batches of documents during his term. In 2021, he postponed the planned release of several JFK documents, citing the delay to the coronavirus pandemic. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

 

Trump had also promised to release the last batch of documents during his first term, but such efforts ultimately dissipated. Trump blocked the release of hundreds of records on the assassination following several CIA and FBI appeals.

Former President Joe Biden also released batches of documents during his term. In 2021, he postponed the planned release of several JFK documents, citing the delay to the coronavirus pandemic.

 

 

Exclusive: US suspends some efforts to counter Russian sabotage as Trump moves closer to Putin

 

 

 

NEW YORK/BERLIN, March 19 (Reuters) – Several U.S. national security agencies have halted work on a coordinated effort to counter Russian sabotage, disinformation and cyberattacks, easing pressure on Moscow as the Trump Administration pushes Russia to end its war in Ukraine.

Former President Joe Biden last year ordered his national security team to establish working groups to monitor the issue amid warnings from U.S. intelligence that Russia was escalating a shadow war against Western nations.

The plan was led by the president’s National Security Council (NSC) and involved at least seven national security agencies working with European allies to disrupt plots targeting Europe and the United States, seven former officials who participated in the working groups told Reuters.

Before President Donald Trump was inaugurated, his incoming administration was briefed by Biden officials about the efforts and urged to continue monitoring Russia’s hybrid warfare campaign, the former U.S. officials said.

However, since Trump took office on Jan. 20 much of the work has come to a standstill, according to eleven current and former officials, all of whom requested anonymity to discuss classified matters. Reuters is the first to report on the full extent of the Biden administration effort and how multiple different U.S. agencies have since paused their work on the issue.

Regular meetings between the National Security Council and European national security officials have gone unscheduled, and the NSC has also stopped formally coordinating efforts across U.S. agencies, including with the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security and the State Department, the current and former officials said.

Reuters could not determine whether the president has ordered the administration to halt all its work monitoring and combatting Russia’s campaign, whether agencies were still working to hire additional staff, or if they are making their own policy decisions independent of the White House.

Some officials involved in the working groups said they are concerned that the Trump administration is de-prioritizing the issue despite intelligence warnings. The change follows the unwinding of other Russia-focused projects launched by Biden’s administration.

The FBI last month ended an effort to counter interference in U.S. elections by foreign adversaries including Russia and put on leave staff working on the issue at the Department of Homeland Security. The Department of Justice also disbanded a team that seized the assets of Russian oligarchs.

The White House has not told career officials who’d previously participated in the effort whether it will recreate the cross-agency working groups, according to the current U.S. officials.

It is unclear to what extent the U.S. is still sharing intelligence related to the sabotage campaign with European allies. UK government officials said that routine intelligence sharing between the United States and the British government continues.

When asked for comment about the suspension of the coordinated efforts, the White House deferred to the NSC.

Brian Hughes, spokesperson for the National Security Council, said that it coordinates “with relevant agencies to assess and thwart threats posed to Americans.”

“President Trump has made it abundantly clear that any attack on the U.S. will be met with a disproportionate response,” he said.

A senior U.S. official at NATO said the U.S. was still coordinating with its allies on the issue but declined to offer more detail. The CIA, FBI and the State Department declined to comment.

Anitta Hipper, EU Spokesperson for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, said she had no specific information to share when asked about the suspension of some intelligence-sharing meetings. She said the EU was coordinating with NATO on countering hybrid threats, which span everything from physical sabotage of critical infrastructure to disinformation campaigns.

.

NEW POLICY TOWARD EUROPE

The pause in the cross-agency effort comes as Trump upends U.S. policy toward Europe and Ukraine, stirring fears among some current and former U.S. and European officials that Ukraine may be forced into a truce favorable to Russia.

In recent weeks, Trump has made statements and policy moves appearing to favor Russia that have drawn criticism from both Democrats and some Republicans. But the president has argued that the conflict in Ukraine has the potential to spiral into World War Three and that improved relations with Russia are in America’s strategic interest.

Putin agreed to a proposal by Trump on Tuesday that Russia and Ukraine cease attacking each other’s energy infrastructure for 30 days, the Kremlin said following a lengthy phone discussion between the leaders.

Some analysts told Reuters that reducing work to counter Moscow’s hybrid war tactics would prove dangerous for the U.S.

“We’re choosing to blind ourselves to potential acts of war against us,” said Kori Schake, the director of foreign and defense policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute, a Washington-based think tank, who has been critical of Trump’s engagement with Putin, opens new tab.

Over the last three years, Russia has recruited criminals in European countries for sabotage operations across the continent – including arson, attempted assassinations and planting bombs on cargo aircraft. Russia has also used influence campaigns and cyber operations to erode support for Ukraine, Western intelligence officials told Reuters.

The intelligence officials said the number of sabotage acts by Russia declined at the end of 2024, but warned that they expect Moscow to continue its hybrid warfare while Western support for Ukraine continues.

Asked about the pause in some of Washington’s work to track its hybrid warfare campaign, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said the Trump administration was trying to get rid of “everything ineffective, corrupt and implausible,” something he said was “understandable.”

He added that Western accusations that Russia commits sabotage in the U.S. and Europe are “empty and ephemeral” and have not been proven.

SHADOW WAR

After Russian forces streamed across Ukraine’s border three years ago, Moscow’s intelligence agencies launched a shadow war aimed at undercutting the U.S.-led effort to bolster Kyiv’s resistance, six Western intelligence and national security officials told Reuters. Congress has approved $175 billion in assistance to Ukraine since Russia launched its full-scale invasion three years ago.

Moscow’s efforts to retaliate against the West escalated in spring 2024 with arson attacks throughout Europe, including one at a warehouse in London with connections to a Ukrainian-born businessman. Six individuals were charged with aggravated arson for that attack in a British court in November; at least two of them pleaded guilty to accepting payment from a foreign intelligence service. A trial is due to begin in June.

In response to the uptick, Biden directed his national security agencies to increase intelligence sharing with Europe and create task forces to combat Russian operations and ensure attacks did not occur in the U.S., the former U.S. officials said.

American intelligence officials, working with domestic law enforcement, assessed that Moscow intended to target not only Russian dissidents around the world but also other civilians, including those helping Ukraine’s war efforts.

The U.S. alerted Germany that Russia was attempting to assassinate the CEO of Rheinmetall, a German manufacturer whose weapons were being used by Ukraine, two former senior U.S. officials said. German law enforcement interrupted the plan. Rheinmetall declined to comment.

By late summer, the National Security Council set up in-person and virtual meetings with European national security officials to share intelligence on plots in Europe and to coordinate investigations, four former senior U.S. officials said.

That led to joint plans for addressing sabotage attacks, including procedures for arrests and a proposal for longer prison sentences for those convicted, four former senior U.S. officials said.

A memo drafted by the U.S. and Britain at the end of 2024 advocated that, among other steps, European countries’ law enforcement agencies work more closely to track criminal networks conducting the sabotage. It also proposed that European governments reduce their diplomatic presence in Moscow to force Russia to cut its staffing in European embassies, two senior U.S. officials said.

Some of those steps are still under discussion among European countries, one former senior U.S. official said. The British embassy in Washington did not respond to a request for comment.

In contrast to its Western allies, the Trump administration is currently in talks with Moscow about increasing Russia’s diplomatic presence in Washington, one current senior U.S. official said. The White House did not respond to queries about the memo or the move to potentially increase Russia’s diplomatic presence.

U.S. agencies, including the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), have for years tracked Russian influence operations and ransomware attacks on U.S. critical infrastructure. Under Biden, top cybersecurity officials led an interagency team to share with European countries Russia’s attempts to influence local elections and how to deter Moscow’s attacks on national security systems, one former senior U.S. official said.

The victory of far right, pro-Putin candidate, Calin Georgescu, in the first round of Romania’s presidential election in November was annulled by the country’s constitutional court after declassified Romanian intelligence reports indicated possible Russian interference – a decision criticized by Trump’s Vice President JD Vance. Georgescu and Moscow have denied any meddling.

CISA Deputy Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin told Reuters the agency had placed on administrative leave personnel working on misinformation and disinformation on its election security team, without elaborating further.

McLaughlin said CISA “remains committed to addressing all cyber threats to U.S. critical infrastructure, including from Russia.”

THREAT TO THE HOMELAND

In another example of cooperation under Biden, the administration dispatched teams from the State Department and other agencies to help European countries investigate damage to several essential undersea cables.

One of the teams traveled to Copenhagen to help in December after Finland seized a tanker suspected of dragging its anchor on the Baltic Sea floor to deliberately damage cable networks, one former and one current senior U.S. official said.

The tanker, the Eagle S, is believed by Western intelligence officials to belong to a shadow fleet of ships Russia uses to evade oil sanctions. Russia has denied its involvement in a spate of cable incidents. Some Western intelligence and national security officials caution there is no smoking gun that signals Moscow’s direct responsibility in all of the recent cable cutting incidents.

In mid-2024, American agencies collected intelligence suggesting that Russia might detonate an incendiary device on a cargo or passenger aircraft over U.S. airspace, which provoked alarm in the U.S., multiple former officials told Reuters.

“That was almost psychologically a very different threat than sabotage operations in Europe that were damaging property,” one former senior U.S. official said. “Bringing down planes is a whole different category.”

While there was no clear evidence that Moscow formulated a plan to attack inside the U.S., the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security crafted strategies for domestic agencies to increase screening of cargo entering the U.S.

U.S. officials were so concerned that Biden directed Jake Sullivan, his national security adviser, and CIA Director Bill Burns to warn Putin and his top aides that if the campaign continued, especially inside the U.S., Washington could list Russia as a state sponsor of terrorism – a designation that would further isolate its economy from the world.

The New York Times first reported the meetings between the Biden officials and the Kremlin.

Since then, no attack has taken place inside the U.S. and the number of sabotage attacks in Europe dropped at the end of 2024, according to three Western intelligence officials, who attributed the change at least in part to vigilance from Western governments and coordination between Europe and the U.S.

Still, multiple Western intelligence officials said they assess that Russia will continue its campaign as long as the U.S. and Europe continues to support Ukraine.

Post Views: 5

Step into a world dedicated entirely to man's best friend - dogs. Our website is a treasure trove of heartwarming news, touching stories, and inspiring narratives centered around these incredible creatures. We invite you to join us in spreading the joy. Share our posts, stories, and articles with your friends, extending the warmth and inspiration to every corner.With a simple click, you can be part of this movement.